Fundamentally, a discussion of morals, ideologies, and cultural direction arises from the controversial figure, a healthy piece of a well functioning society and something that Ai Weiwei’s China cannot have due to incomplete freedom of art.A fundamental truth regarding the nature of art stems from such ideas; suppression of art destroys the ability of a society to communicate, even if some may consider the art destructive.Tags: Creative Writing Universities In TexasGood Quotes To End EssaysEssay On Learning StylesAnti Social Behaviour Orders EssayYear 3 Homework PackCrime Narrative EssayWrite An Essay In FrenchThe Story Of An Hour Feminism EssayGed Sample Essays
A society should grant the same legal freedom to artistic speech as it does to any other type of speech, pending it grants such freedoms in the first place.
A sick, stagnant population may be created through censorship of free art, speech, and education.
The freedom of artistic expression should have extended to it the same degree of legal freedom granted to all other forms of speech; to forgo complete freedom of artistic expression would result in the suppression of human creativity as well as the suppression of the other types of speech for the artistic tradition closely identifies with all of the other forms of free speech.
The eminent Chinese artist Ai Wei Wei works at the pinnacle of the freedom of art in our day, working proactively, provocatively, and politically.
The experiment of free artistic expression as demonstrated by Cyrus underscores the need of free speech; discussion is healthy and discussion often stems from art.
The implications of producing provocative, crude, or even bad art in the eyes of some may very well end up tainting a society at its core; Jean-Jacques Rousseau makes that very contention.
Just a socrates called himself a “Gadfly of Athens” (Plato 30e), Ai Weiwei, it could be said, is the Gadfly of Beijing.
The suppression of his art has come in many untenable forms which ultimately embarrass and expose his government on the international art and political stage.
Perhaps a proof of the saying comes in the, what some would classify as disturbing, form of the music, persona, and performance of the American pop star Miley Cyrus.
Whether or not one considers the productions of Cyrus art is contentious in itself; for the purposes of this paper and according to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, art may be defined as an entity “intentionally endowed by their makers with a significant degree of aesthetic interest, often surpassing that of most everyday objects” (Stanford). Those who condemn the girl who carries “the torch of sexually provocative pop stars,” ultimately call for the condemnation, suppression, and censorship of art (Feeny).