A zoologist, for example, might not be able to acquire many chimpanzees for her study.But because small sample sizes make the statistics of a study less dependable, the results of a study that lacks sufficient funding might not be strong or mathematically significant.But small differences, such as lifestyle and genetic factors can skew the effects of the drugs on the subjects.Tags: Controversial Topics For Argumentative EssayAntithesis To ArbitrarinessPhilosophy Essay WritingBlack Rock EssayResearch Analysis PaperHelp Me With My Math Homework For FreeDissertation Research And WritingHp Problem SolvingEssay On Martin Luther King JrWhen Do You Have To Write A Thesis
Having written professionally since 2001, he has been featured in financial publications such as Safe Haven and the Mc Millian Portfolio.
He also runs a financial newsletter at Stock Barometer.
But how well a study reports its results relates to how strong the instruments are.
For example, microscopes have limitations on what they measure.
Regent University mentions that limitations outside of a scientist’s control are remarkably common.
For example, a botanist researching the relationship between the amount of pests on a specific plant and the amount of sunlight that plant receives might have missing data if he finds several plants to be missing next time he reaches his plot of land.
He might suspect the plants were eaten by a wild herbivore.
In this case, his sample size has been reduced by phenomena he cannot control, which can weaken his study.
While you can use a microscope to view a two-dimensional image of bacteria and record results from that image, you won’t be able to record the height of the bacteria.
If one thing you are reporting in your study is the volume of bacteria, you will have to estimate the height and multiply it by the observed area to get a volume.